satg3.jpg (38918 bytes)


 

SATG Electronic Forum Discussion on Natural Resources Management-Deforestation and Charcoal Export

July 8, 2004

Hussein Haji wrote:

Dear members,

The revised agenda, including recent suggestions from Robert Lavigne, is as follows.

1. Discuss the status of the irrigation infrastructure and the need for their rehabilitation. Did any of the current donors, NGOs, etc., assess the degree of damage to these infrastructures? (Dr. Noor)

2. Natural resource management. (Dr. Noor)

3. Establishment of an agriculture research unit. (Hussein)

4. Banana diversification Project (Awes, Mohamood)

5. SATG re-structuring (Awes)

6. Crop and grain damages caused by Pre and post-harvest insect infestation. Attention to new locust plague heading to Somalia, stored grain insects. (Robert Lavigne)

7. Issues related with Marketing support systems (within Somalia and overseas) and Food Safety, especially for fruit and vegetable. (Abdullahi Green)

8. Provision of appropriate technology in food preservation (Abdullahi Green)

9. Human resource development. (Aden)

I believe we have sufficient agenda items for discussion. In my opinion, discussion on the banana diversification could be a good start since it covers several sectors of agriculture. For those of you, who are still contemplating on submitting new agenda, please send it to me directly.

Need for a volunteer: For the discussion to come on the next agenda, we need someone to volunteer to record the minutes which will later be published on our website. If we do not have any volunteers within the next two days, we will randomly select three names from the membership list in the event that some members decide to decline.

Mohamood, we may need more than a week for each agenda item.

Ahmadey, welcome to SATG discussion forum. Your contribution to SACB agriculture strategy was highly significant.

Regards, Hussein

 

July 9, 2004

Christoph LANGENKAMP wrote:

Dear members,

Firstly, I would like to thank Hussein whom I had the pleasure to meet during the SACB strategy workshop and who included me in the SATG mailing list. I think this discussion group is very important and it is great to hear from so many dedicated professionals that are committed to improved livelihoods in Somalia.

To briefly introduce myself, I am an agronomist (with further studies in hydrology) and currently working for the European Commission, managing the EC funded agricultural and rural water programmes for Somalia.

I do find the list Hussein has finalized very useful, representing important issues for Somalia. Some of these issues are as well discussed in other fora like the SACB food security and rural development committee, the agricultural WG, the flood working group, field meetings etc. Some comments on the different issues mentioned by

Hussein:

Point 1: There have been extensive discussions about rehabilitation of irrigation infrastructure. The banana study for example recommends significant investment into the rehabilitation and current planning is accordingly. Rehabilitation will be recorded in an Irrigation database by the FAO implemented and EC funded Somalia Water and Land Information Management System (SWALIM) for future reference and for a future national administration. There have been I would call it partial assessments but no overall assessment of the situation. Security permitting, I would expect more structured and comprehensive assessments in 2005. As the task is phenomenal and much has still to be done, I am sure members of this group have to make an important contribution.

Point 2: Natural resource management is a critical issue for the EC in its development goals. One of the key limiting factors is however the lack of an enabling environment in Somalia. One issue that we intend to promote is the promotion of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) at various levels. We know it is a complex and lengthy process, but it is better to start promoting it now than waiting for years. Secondly, the EC is finalizing a feasibility study, assessing opportunities on how marginal rural areas can be supported. This study will include an expert workshop during September/October 2004. I will make sure that this group will be considered by the consultants and would appreciate if one or two members of this group that have special knowledge could participate during the WS. Massive charcoal export is a key issue for NRM, but how to tackle it....

Point 3: A very important imitative. 15 years without agricultural research and only very limited training (knowledge transfer) is a disaster. Some INGOs do run training programmes, but they are limited in scope and spatial distribution. This I think is a point for this group. I would suggest linking it to knowledge transfer. An issue that requires more structured thinking and the wealth of knowledge of this group may contribute a lot.

Point 4: Based on the dramatically changed trade regime for banana, the study suggested rehabilitation of irrigation infrastructure and crop diversification. As Mohamood Noor, whom I had the pleasure to meet earlier, rightly remarked, diversification does not exclude banana but broadens the opportunities. Furthermore, the programme will not decide for what the water from the rehabilitated irrigation schemes will be used. It is hoped that implementation can start early 2005. It should be noted that already a good number of INGOs are operational in the area and the programme will largely be a continuation of the current activities.

Point 6: The INGO UNA is implementing an IPM project for Somalia. The project has among others and in collaboration with many stakeholders, developed the following training modules:

1. Safe use of pesticides

2. Management of stem borers

3. Management of tomato pests and diseases

4. Management of insect pests of stored cereals and pulse grains

5. Management of rodent pests.

Each training module consists usually of a bibliography, a handbook (trainers manual), a poster and flyer for farmers. Much of it is available in electronic and print format as well as in Somali and English language. Furthermore, the project has managed to be allowed to (copy right) and to run a reprint of the Pest Management Handbook for Somalia. A proper revised edition may be published during the next phase of the project, hopefully starting very soon. Once the project is operational again, I am sure they will be happy to get your feedback and to distribute the material (I guess the material may fill several CD ROMs in the end). By the way, the project manager, Dr. Andrew Harberd, who is as well the chair of the SACB agricultural working group may be known to a good number of the members.

With the hope that in future I can find a bit more time to more frequently (and less lengthy) contribute to this forum, best regards and warm greetings

Christoph

PS. Please note that I do contribute to this forum in my private capacity!

Christoph LANGENKAMP

Rural Development TA

Delegation of the European Commission in the Republic of Kenya - Somalia Operations

P.O. Box 30475

00100 Nairobi, Kenya

 

July 10, 2004

Aden Aw-Hassan wrote:

Members;

I add my voice to the NRM as the priority. When we were in the college of Afgoi some of you may remember how we used to count the number of overloaded trucks transporting charcoal to Mogadishu. This gravity of the situation is well known now. The question is what are the practical and policy actions that can be taken to reduce this damage.

I like to thank Christoph LANGENKAMP with his impressive list of activities that INGOs, FAO and the supporting donors are caring out in Somalia.

But although your list of development activities is impressive, it is important to remind us that the only lasting development progress is that imbedded into human capital. Other capitals are important but if human capacity is lacking sustained progress will be difficult. My question is how much of that list of activities will leave a lasting and measurable improvement in human capital in Somalia. Because ultimately the Somalis should dig themselves, out of the underdevelopment hole. How the Somali NGOs are performing to tackle these development issues and what support are they getting from international community, how their performance is measured and rewarded? Is capacity building a development priority for INGOs and donors? We can see a lot of successful private sector albeit with limitations (telephones are opened in Ceeldeer, Galgaduud region this week, Coca Cola Factory is opened last week in Mogadishu, etc). These developments are serving the public. Can the pubic sector demonstrate similar successes albeit lack of government? Do not get me wrong I am not underestimating the difficulties facing the public sector in the absence of government, but capable, credible and accountable NGO sector doing effective development services can generate valuable human capital essential for good public service in the future? In fact, how to build human capital for development can be a topic for discussion for this group. I also agree with Christoph that the development activities can utilize member in this valuable list.

Aden Aw-Hassan

July 11, 2004

Mohamoud Abdi Noor wrote:

Dear Members,

I think we have full agenda.  I am also glad that we have on board those who have ongoing activities in the field. Let us start the discussion and come up with challenges facing us in these topic as well as the possible solutions.  I am sure some of the problems are being addressed by the many ongoing initiatives.

I also agree with suggestion of building the capacity of Somali NGOs through true partnership with the INGOs.  This an area in which the members of SATG could also contribute through short-term assignments supporting the Somali NGOs. 

Regards, Mohamood

July 14, 2004

Hussein Haji wrote:

Dear members,

It appears that the agenda on natural resources management has taken precedence over the rest of the agenda on the list. Dr. Noor proposed this agenda. The title of the agenda is very broad. It includes aspects of resources management related to water, soil, crop and livestock, agro-forestry, fisheries, etc. However, based on some of the comments made while setting the agenda, it is quite obvious that the massive charcoal export to the Middle Eastern countries is going to be the key issue. I assume that it will be ideal for Dr. Noor to elaborate more on this agenda before engaging into the discussion.

It is my pleasure to welcome Dr. Bashir Jama to SATG electronic forum. Bashir works for the International Centre for Research on Agroforestry (ICRAF), based in Nairobi, Kenya. He is the coordinator for the East and Central Africa Regional Program. I invited Bashir to be part of the discussion on natural resources management. His expertise in this field and his international exposure to NRM, particularly to East and Central Africa, will definitely help the group develop some sorts of policies and strategies for intervention.

The discussion on NRM may also lead the group to look at alternative energy sources for domestic uses, e.g. solar energy, wind mills, etc. The board is considering inviting experts in this field in the event that there is a need to cover these issues as well.

Mohamed Khasse has volunteered to record the minutes on this agenda item, and summarize it for its use on the SATG website. Thanks Khasse.

Khalif, I wish you an exciting journey to Somalia. One area that you can really help is to assist in establishing the linkage between SATG and local agriculture agencies.

Best regards, Hussein

July 17, 2004

Ali Ismail Ibrahim wrote:

Dear Dr. Hussein,

It is a good idea that next discussion agenda will be on natural resource management. Let focus on specific sub-top including charcoal consumption and its export to Arabia peninsula. Please be reminded some studies on charcoal had undertaken in various parts in Somalia/Somaliland. I will be available to participate on this discussion regarding charcoal.

In the meantime, next discussion can be included water and soil conservation based on community level.

Thank you very much indeed for cooperation.

Best regards

Ali Ismail

Hrageisa

July 17, 2004

Mohamoud Abdi Noor wrote:

Dear Members,

First, I would like to warmly welcome Bashir Jama to the group. Second, the degradation of our natural resources is not limited to the export of charcoal, although it is the most pressing issue and has implications for the other components of the natural resources.   Therefore, I would like to suggest that we address the following issues and come up with some recommendations for each:

1. Deforestation with emphasis on charcoal export, domestic energy, impact on livestock and wildlife (camels, goats and wildlife).

2. Economically important species such as frankincense, myrrh, yeeb, Arabic gum, aloe, etc.

3. Wildlife.

4. Water resources.

5. Soil degradation.

We can discuss these issues in sequence or in parallel.  Khasse, may Allah reward him, will summarize the outcome. 

Regards,

Mohamood

July 19, 2004

Bashir Jama wrote:

Dear Mohamood:

Thanks for the warm welcome. I will do my best to contribute to the group discussion and to the NRM issues of Somalia.  I think you have provided a comprehensive list that we could discuss for a long while. It may help also help if we discussed the cause-effects of the problems, and do so within regional and global perspectives as they surely contribute to both the problems and their solutions.

To focus the discussions, it would help if someone provided leadership and summarized the key issues emerging on a weekly basis. You would certainly be a good person to do that, given your enormous experience on these issues and on Somalia that I have unfortunately never visited.

Cheers,

Bashir Jama,

Regional Coordinator, ICRAF-ECA Region

July 21, 2004

Abdullahi Green wrote:

Dear Members,

I think the extend deforestation has taken place in Somalia for the last decade or so is alarming, to say the least, and lack of governing authority has exacerbated the situation. I do not have hard data to support my perception, however, the growing charcoal business alone is a good indicator of the rate at which trees (which were already sparse in most of the country) are cut down. It was in the news some time ago and I heard that concerned Somalis has written to UN and to United Arab Emirates where most of that trade is destined.

Perhaps, our Somali colleague in the forum [or NGOs which were involved in programmes intended to slow down the impact of human activity on the environment] such as Shirwa and Baffo etc., who are more closely in tune of what is going inside the country can give us an update.

I'll try to dig a document I read a while back regarding this subject and I'll share with the forum its principal points.

Best regards,

Abdullahi Green

July 22, 2004

Mohamoud "Khalif Bidaar" wrote:

Dear Members

Deforestation in Somalia started with the settlement of people in the villages and cities because of their needs of woods and charcoals for cooking and construction. Whenever there is an increase of urban people, the wood and charcoal needs go up and therefore there is a severe consequence in the environment. On top of the uses of wood and charcoal nationally, there is a new phenomenon of charcoal export.

I think that the members’ discussion will focus on how an alternative and viable energy for cooking and construction materials can be developed in the country and how the charcoal export can be stopped in a short time.

Regards, Khalif Bidaar

July 22, 2004

 

JH Tim Williams wrote:

HI.

I would prefer you all to see this deforestation and export of charcoal as an opportunity.  The problem is really that of the trees being a common good and there being no incentive for people to invest in producing trees. The demand for fuel provides the opportunity for development of a solar energy-for-cooking industry and for forestation to provide for the provision of charcoal for both local and export markets. This may require some policy/incentive changes to require that people removing trees replant more than they remove.  Solar cooking technologies need not be expensive/capital intensive.

 

 JHW

July 22, 2004

Mohamed Ali Khasse wrote:

I see the opportunity in educating those involved in harvesting, selling, transporting and exporting the trees--charcoal. In addition, we need to devise awareness strategies on putting out the severity of deforestation in the country to all Somalis. Grassroots and community organization efforts would make a difference.

Regards, Khasse

July 23, 2004

Bashir Jama wrote:

Dear colleagues;

What would help the discussion a little bit more is information on the hot spots (geographical areas within the country) of deforestation for charcoal. How much is exported annually and is it all from one region within the country or more?  What is it being used for in the Emirates? May be the customers there could also do with advice on energy saving devices such as the solar panels or cook stoves. I would like to know a little bit more what the main uses of the charcoal in the Emirates and elsewhere it is going. This information would help us a great deal in thinking of what the most appropriate interventions may be.

Cheers,

Bashir Jama

July 23, 2004

Hussein Haji wrote:

Dear members,

Bashir, the articles on the following links may provide some answers to your questions.

http://www.hamarey.com/index.php/article/articleview/646/1/4

http://www.banadir.com/comm.shtml

Regards, Hussein

July 23, 2004

Bob Buker wrote:

Hussein,

Solar thermal using mirrors as low cost as those used in candy bar rappers could provide 90% of the cooking fuel in Somalia.

Bob Buker

July 26, 2004

Mohamoud Ali wrote:

The issue of charcoal is a pervasive one through out Africa and more in the Sahelian Belt. What makes it more destructive and ubiquitous in Somalia is the excessive migration to urban centers from rural areas. The man-made global warming where the drier regions of the world would be scorched quicker than temperate regions that have floods and turbulent climate changes. The prevailing survivalist mode in the country, the lack of any regulatory entities with enforcement, the unaffordability and unavailability of appropriate substitute cooking technology to the Somali households and the lucrative charcoal export to the Gulf makes the situation worse.

Unless all the stakeholders in the charcoal web in a holistic approach tackle all the above factors, the problem will stay for the time being. Therefore, to focus only on charcoal in the discussion is in humble opinion a futile, in NRM section.

I believe, before the implosion of Somalia, the Range Agency and its parent Ministry were making some tangible efforts in this area. I also believe many of those individuals running those activities are around. I think it would be advisable to locate them, as part of our data collection exercise and benefit from them. I think the long time general manager of that agency is in Nairobi now and I know two of the last Directors of the Forestry Department, one of whom is one who started the Department itself in 1960 and was the Director General of the Ministry of Livestock, forest, Range and Wild Life since the creation of that Ministry. His advice and experience is of immense value. There is a local NGO in Puntland that has a functioning status on Environmental Degradation and Mitigation. I believe it is the only one, in my knowledge, at home now. Back then; GTZ was doing a pilot test in Mubarak Village, Lower Shabeelle, for solar stove, as a small component in the Lower Shabeelle Small Holder Irrigation Project. It would be of interest if they have produced a report on them or came back to continue their effort.

Having addressed that global issue, I am of the opinion that what could be more effective, efficient, achievable, manageable and most pressing issue on NRM is the Irrigation Rehabilitation, with quickest impact, as proposed by Dr. Noor. Therefore, I think it is more advisable to address this issue in the discussion, rather than loose more time and effort only on charcoal.

I do apologize for the length of the statement.

Mohamoud Ali

July 26, 2004

Mohamed Ali Khasse wrote:

Mr.Buker,

Back in 1989, through an FAO Consultant from California, the Food Policy Group of the Ministry of Agriculture demonstrated use of Homemade Solar Box Cookers in Mogadishu and Bariire (Afgoye Area). We used cardboard, aluminum foil, small piece of square glass, small stick to open/close the box, glue and dark pots. The demonstration was very successful and continued by an NGO Group in the Marka area. Again, as I mentioned earlier, it is a matter of giving the people alternatives to cook their food. The price of charcoal is going up and people are ready to get other way of cooking food. I believe the ingenious Somali people will come up with new ways of cooking.

Regards,

July 27, 2004

Mohamoud Abdi Noor wrote:

Colleagues,

Can Khasse summarize the NRM and come up with recommendations based on the discussions?   We can add our final input to the summary and then move to another topic.   Regards,

Mohamood

July 28, 2004

Mohamed Ali Khasse wrote:

Dr. Noor,

I am waiting the rest of the distinguished members to put out their voices before embarking on summarizing the NRM issues so far discussed. I hope to post the summary on Saturday, July 31, 2004.

Best regards, Khasse

 

July 28, 2004

Hussein Haji wrote:

Dear members,

This is to remind the group about the different components of NRM proposed for discussion by Dr. Noor. Based on the on-going discussion, we hardly scratched the surface of the first part (deforestation and charcoal export) and, for whatever reason; most inputs have come from those that are remotely connected to the actual situation on the ground. To have a meaningful recommendation, we do need feedback from the insiders. Here are the different aspects of NRM suggested earlier by Dr. Noor:

1. Deforestation with emphasis on charcoal export, domestic energy, impact on livestock and wildlife (camels, goats and wildlife).

2. Economically important species such as frankincense, myrrh, yeeb, Arabic gum, aloe, etc.

3. Wildlife.

4. Water resources.

5. Soil degradation.

Regards, Hussein

July 30, 2004

Mohamoud Abdi Noor wrote:

Hussein,

I agree with the list you proposed and to ask for insiders input. Let us extend the time and wait for input on the topics listed by Hussein. 

Regards,

Mohamood

August 1, 2004

Aden Aw-Hassan wrote:

Dear all;

I see now that the discussion is on. Here are some of my thoughts.

Deforestation is a result of a number of basic development factors: 

1. Clearing land for settlements and for construction driven by human population growth and the demand for open land and construction material.

2. Clearing land for cultivation, this is also driven my human population growth and the demand for food

3. Cutting trees for livestock feed and overgrazing of bushes.

4. Cutting trees for energy for domestic use and for export (this is the most serious problem facing Somalia).  

Deforestation is also affected by a number of institutional factors. These could include:

b) Lack of property rights

c) Non existence of institutions that research, document, develop and enforce rules and regulations for managing natural resources

d) Contradicting government ministries pursuing different objectives or simply having disjoint operations

e) Low cost and unregulated fuel woods market

f) Higher cost and lack of know-how on the use of cooking gas, and

g) Lack of alternative livelihoods for those involved in fuel wood enterprise.

 

Given these diagnosis, the remedy is apparently multiple and complex. We can start with some immediate actions while waiting the establishment of a legitimate and effective government in the whole country (we can not wait for that):

1. Establish and strengthen the NGOs currently involved in combating desertification in their capacity in data gathering, documenting and developing public awareness of the problem as well as initiating pilot projects such as planting trees in community protected areas near villages! These will be used as educational areas.

2. Initiate programs through NGOs that promote the use of cooking gas technologies in the urban areas, reducing the taxes on cooking gas technologies. Performance of NGOs will be determined by their ability to transform urban use of wood fuel to cooking gas technology. This performance will be assessed against predetermined targets. But this will not be possible as long as the charcoal option is cheaper. This calls for effective regulation of charcoal market. This can be addressed, at least temporarily, by developing programs for the functioning regional governments and functioning local village councils to regulate the charcoal market under strict UNDP or UNEP guidelines. The proceedings of the charcoal tax could be matched with development fund (dollar for 2 dollars), which will be spent on development program on the most affected areas (which lose the charcoal income) due to the regulation and on the development and promotion of cooking gas technology.

3. The UNDPO should make dialogue with the importing countries along with Somali stakeholders (Concerned Somali entities like Universities, NGOS, this Forum, etc) in taking credible actions in controlling the charcoal imports in to their countries.

4.  This Forum must participate in the capacity building of NGOS and stakeholder discussion in taking action.  

5. All the above points can be prepared as a proposal document to be submitted to UNDP or UNEP for funding.

We can do these small practical steps immediately.

One final point, when a legitimate government is formed, (hopefully, soon) there should not be separate Ministries of Agriculture, and Livestock and Range. As these sectors are integrated and if disjoint decisions/programs are taken/implemented, as has been the case in the past, it will contribute to weak institutional framework that can not effectively combat deforestation.

Regards,

 

Aden Aw-Hassan

Research Project Manager

Agricultural Economist

ICARDA

A.Aw-Hassan@cgiar.org

August 1, 2004

Aden Aw-Hassan wrote:

I have seen Roberto's comment after sending mine. It is great. This should be part of what I proposed. What we need is immediate action. The technologies and other regulatory instruments are well known and are available. We need action. We need to conceive a program (modest one) that some of these ideas and technologies can be tested in different places in the country, which could form the basis for national action plan in the future.

Aden

August 3, 2004

Abdullahi Green wrote:

Dear Colleaques,

In addition to Aden's recommendation, I would like to add the donor agencies such FAO should facilitate the resumption of livestock export to Arabia. They can help in disease and quality control assurance. In this way, the businessmen will revert to their traditional livestock trading practices and thus cease cutting trees.

I came across this essay regarding deforestation written by PhD candidate.

Here is the link:

http://www.somwat.com/Essay.html

Thanks

Abdullahi Green

August 3, 2004

Hussein Haji wrote:

Khasse,

The only part of the agenda on NRM so far discussed is deforestation and charcoal export. We have a long way to go. Go ahead, summarize what has been discussed up to this date, and if possible post it to the forum at the earliest possible time. Once the first part is completed than we can shift the discussion to the other parts of the agenda (water and soil management, Crop and livestock, biodiversity, etc.).

Regards, Hussein

August 3, 2004

Hussein Haji wrote:

Dear members,

Aden, the following summary of a study conducted in Somalia on cooking gas technologies as an alternative sources to charcoal might be of interest to you. The complete report can be found at ODI website. We have a link to the report under alternatives to energy at http://www.markacadeey.com/satg/.

Here is the summary:

The Government of Somalia Technical Committee for Energy’s final report on alternative energy sources for urban areas. [Soussan, J. 1990. ETC Consultants, UK J Soussan]. This report was commissioned by the Somali government to weigh up alternatives to the prevailing high levels of charcoal consumption in Mogadishu. Neither electricity nor LPG (natural gas) were viable substitutes for charcoal because the costs of appliances and connections would exclude poor households. Kerosene was the only possible alternative. The author argued that to promote the use of kerosene over charcoal, the government would have to begin importing the fuel and to dismantle the present system of price controls and monopolies by two retail co-operatives. Overall, the report provides a concise and realistic appraisal of the policy choices faced in an urban setting of poor infrastructure, widespread poverty, rampant inflation and limited foreign currency.

Regards, Hussein

August 3, 2004

Mohamed Ali Khasse wrote:

Colleagues,

"Green" Abdullahi thanks for your effort to forward the essay "on

Deforestation" by Abdullahi Elmi Mohamed, Ph.D. candidate, to this forum. So far, the discussion on the proposed NRM Agenda focused on Deforestation and Export of Charcoal. Before we move on to the other parts of the NRM Agenda [Water & Soil Management, Crop and livestock, biodiversity, etc.], please submit your comments, suggestions, solutions/alternatives on Deforestation and Export of Charcoal before the weekend. This will give me time to summarize the Agenda item and make it available to all members in the Forum.

If any one feels that we need more time to cover this item, please let us know. It is summer time, possibly some members are on vacation and did not have time to review the discussions. Let us conclude this item and move on to the next.

Regards,

August 4, 2004

Kate Longley wrote:

FAO, EC and World Bank have recently developed a livestock sector strategy for Somalia. It is a huge document, but I will try to get hold of an electronic copy and send it to Hussein Haji so that he can make it available on the SATG website. The World Bank (though its initiative for Low Income Countries Under Stress) is particularly interested in supporting livestock exports. I will also try to find out if the World Bank's LICUS document can be made available.

Regards,

Kate

 

August 4, 2004

Vittorio Cagnolati wrote:

Dear Abdullahi

The resumption of livestock trade is unfortunately much more complex than just asking FAO to facilitate the resumption of animal export. There are at the moment a number of interventions that are trying to address the issue (PACE of IBAR, EXELEX of FAO, Red Sea Livestock trade commission of IBAR among the most relevant). However, animal health certification is increasingly becoming regulated by international standards, which are based on well-structured, funded and functioning veterinary services. At present, the rudimentary Somali veterinary services have major constraints in meeting minimum standards, especially in the absence of internationally recognized government(s). On the other hand, livestock trade is increasingly competitive and other exporting countries are taking advantage of the present difficulties of the Somali livestock industry. Livestock trade requires a variety of well- coordinated interventions, qualified staff, supporting policies, a strong public sector and long-term vision and commitment. All these elements are unfortunately not very abundant in present Somalia and local leaders and decision makers are still hoping for short-term solutions and short cuts. I do not want to appear too pessimistic, but the Somali livestock industry can regain its past role and importance (I strongly believe that the Somali livestock industry has the potentiality of becoming a very important source of income for Somali pastoralists if animal resources are properly branded, certified and export is well-coordinated) only if there is the full appreciation that large investments (especially in human resources) are needed for a very long period. Opportunistic behaviors have worked very well in the past: today globalization is demanding well-targeted and coordinated investments, and livestock trade is much globalized.

Regards

Vittorio Cagnolati

A veterinarian that has worked in the Somali areas in the last eleven years.

Summary

Colleagues,

It seems that the discussion on NRM is winding down. There has not been any activity since August 4 -- a week from tomorrow. So far, I copied 46 e-mails from the Forum discussion into a word document. Some of the e-mails contain valuable recommendations that you will see incorporated in the final summary. The discussion focused on desertification, particularly the devastating impact of charcoal export to the Arabian Peninsula. Moreover, others suggested the need to find low-tech means to substitute use of charcoal for cooking inside the country. With the help of the local authorities in the country, banning export of charcoal, imposing heavy taxes at the local and points of export could be a viable solution for now. In the past, solar cooking demonstrated to be successful in the country. Some other policy changes and incentives proposed were to require those removing trees to plant more than they remove. This will not be possible without educating all involved in this business. Through UNDP and other international agencies, this Forum should avail a venue to bring the gravity of the problem in Somalia to the attention of charcoal importing countries. A colleague suggested there are some "experts" in this field who are still around, and could be tapped for their wisdom. Thus, in the future, to better manage the natural resources of the country and have a strong institution, the recommendation is to have one Ministry of Agriculture dealing with issues related to agriculture, livestock and range management.

If you need details of the discussion, please see attached file.

Regards,

Mohamed Ali Khasse

14910 Enterprise Lane

Woodbridge, VA 22191

703-79-4349 [W]

703-490-6261 [H]

703-298-8013 [M]

 




 


Copyright © SATG, Inc.